Search "user:DailyInsanity"

@Wodjul said in #55: > Those are all very important questions you have raised. Yes, I suppose the overall concern would be with teaching/chess improvement. Many prevailing, general assumptions should …

@GnocchiPup said in #48: > Thank you for your comment and your thoughts. I appreciate your perspective, but I believe you might be giving my argument less rigor than it was intended. The key to the di…

@Toscani said in #47: > Principles are not meant to be rigid rules, but rather flexible guidelines. When a person lives by principles, it does not imply inflexibility or lack of adaptability. This con…

@dboing said in #41: > so we dissect certain things but not others. how about dissecting the word principle? You're absolutely right that we could 'go deep' on this front too. There are actually many …

@Wodjul said in #40: Thank you for that comment! I really enjoyed reading it as you bring up several important points. > Surely, the intent of general principles is to increase the probability of good…

@SmaragdElefant said in #39: > This part is different to the other parts. First difference I didn't read the whole part. Second I can mostly agree. My biggest 'fan' continues to read my posts (or, at …

@sjcjoosten said in #36: > Here there's perhaps a misunderstanding: I argued that for the two principles and the particular position, the premises do hold, just not all of the conclusions. Oh I see. I…

@RoySturgess said in #33: > Dear forum viewers, please don't mind Roy, he is still mourning the shutdown of the Oz chess forums...

@sjcjoosten said in #25: Thank you for your comment! You raise an interesting point by considering an 'extreme' position. It's indeed a good idea to try and limit test such premises to see if they sti…

@Toscani said in #23: > Thank you for your comment, but I'm not sure that LLM summary of my article is very accurate :) It seems that the second part of your response outlines a method for selecting a…