| General Chess Discussion - Death of chess.#48 @Abigail-III said in #43: > I don't get that. That only proves noone has programmed a chess engine to force a win or draw. It doesn't prove the game itself isn't solved. Suppose tomorrow someone finds… | vsdgniuz |
| General Chess Discussion - Death of chess.#41 @Abigail-III said in #40: > That is not true. HeX is a solved game for any N x N sized board: it's a win for the first player with perfect play. And the proof is easy: no game can end in a draw, and w… | vsdgniuz |
| [You can't access this team forum post] | |
| General Chess Discussion - Death of chess.#30 @mkubecek said in #28: > Well, as long as we put aside the possibility that someone already solved it but keeps the fact secret, this does not really need a proof. Apparently, to OP that is not the ca… | vsdgniuz |
| General Chess Discussion - Death of chess.#29 @Brian-E said in #25: > We should be a bit cautious when judging whether chess gets solved in the future by the success rate of programs at forcing a win or a draw. We, and the chess engines, could al… | vsdgniuz |
| General Chess Discussion - Death of chess.#27 @mkubecek said in #26: > I'm afraid you don't understand me. I was asking about a proof of the statement that initial position cannot be "black wins". I think you misunderstand. All I am proving is ch… | vsdgniuz |
| General Chess Discussion - Death of chess.#24 @petri999 said in #22: > there is need to prove chess is not solved. It enough to observer that such proof has not been presented (most likely will not happen). Equally to there is no need to prove th… | vsdgniuz |
| General Chess Discussion - Death of chess.#18 @mkubecek said in #17: > I've seen this statement many times but never with at least a hint of a proof. Can you actually prove that the initial position cannot be winning for black or you just assume … | vsdgniuz |
| General Chess Discussion - Death of chess.#15 @Clearchesser said in #13: > I suppose you are right? The top players would still be good without it though it kinda defeats the purpose of playing knowing you can rarely do as well. I will still make… | vsdgniuz |
| General Chess Discussion - Death of chess.#8 If I understand correctly, your premise is that since computers can beat the best human player, and other human players can't beat the best human player, the game is dead. Chess engines have been here… | vsdgniuz |
| Next | |
|---|---|