He didn't play Qg5. He played Qh4.
So what? the mistake according to the analysis is f6, which is obviously not.
And Qh4 is also mating.
1)} 25... Qe7 26. fxe7 Nc7 27. Rxf7 Kxf7
28. Rf1+ Ke6 29. Rf6+ Kxe7 30. Rd6+ Kf8 31. Qh8+ Kf7 32. Qh7+ Kf8 33. Rf6# {#8/44})
2)} 25... Nc7 26. Qh6 Ne6 27. Rf4 Qa4 28. Be4
Qxe4 29. Rexe4 g5 30. Rh4 gxh4 31. Rg4+ Ng5 32. Rxg5# {#7/44})
And Qh4 is also mating.
1)} 25... Qe7 26. fxe7 Nc7 27. Rxf7 Kxf7
28. Rf1+ Ke6 29. Rf6+ Kxe7 30. Rd6+ Kf8 31. Qh8+ Kf7 32. Qh7+ Kf8 33. Rf6# {#8/44})
2)} 25... Nc7 26. Qh6 Ne6 27. Rf4 Qa4 28. Be4
Qxe4 29. Rexe4 g5 30. Rh4 gxh4 31. Rg4+ Ng5 32. Rxg5# {#7/44})
27. Oh Rf4... I didn't consider- it is forced mate. Thanks for pointing that out.
He played Rf4 in his analysis game by the way :D
Yeah- for some reason I completely missed his analysis link. He even shows the knight going to e6. It was just one of those moments for me.
According to Stockfish on my PC, 24.f6 leads to mate in 9.
c4 leads nowhere :)
c4 leads nowhere :)
The mistake is in the engine as we have seen.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.